Turning Israeli GEO Research into a Content Plan: Nir Levi’s Six-Category Pilot

A GEO research report earns its place in a marketing plan when it helps a team decide what to work on. Nir Levi’s Israeli pilot collected 24 Perplexity answers across six technology-buying questions, using Hebrew and English wording and two same-day rounds. The evidence includes the full answers, exported source links and a reproducible comparison of source hostnames. This creates a concrete starting point for editorial decisions rather than a list of unsupported visibility promises.

What the pilot recorded

The pilot’s 12 English exports contained 67 distinct source hostnames, while its 12 Hebrew exports contained 53. Across the 12 matched language pairs, mean source-host overlap was 34.7%. Hostnames were deduplicated within each calculation, with a leading www removed and other subdomains preserved. All 24 answers were collected on 11 October 2026 in Perplexity Search using the GPT-6.1 Sol model label and fresh incognito conversations.

Source-host overlap is the number of shared hostnames divided by the number of distinct hostnames across the two answer exports. Perplexity’s Copy output is the measured record; grouped on-screen sources may contain additional links.

Begin with one buyer requirement

Choose a question that matters to a real sales or implementation conversation. The pilot’s scenarios included bilingual website operation, cross-team project coordination, competitive traffic research, mobile attribution, network security and administrator-account protection. Each scenario points toward a different kind of useful content. A deployment guide, measurement definition and multilingual setup explanation should have different briefs because they answer different buyer needs.

Connect each assignment to an observed gap

Review the saved answer and its sources with the relevant product or service specialist. Identify a specific explanation the company can improve using information it actually owns. Record the affected page, supporting material, responsible reviewer and acceptance criterion. If the current answer is already clear, preserve that finding too. The review should produce work because there is a documented information need, not because a publishing quota requires another generic article.

Distribute findings from a durable research source

A research-led publishing campaign can use a central report as its reference point and develop distinct articles around different findings. Keep the original prompts, dates and calculations attached to that report. Each companion article should explain a particular implication for its reader instead of repeating the entire study. This gives editors a source they can inspect and provides the business with a maintainable record when the study is repeated or expanded.

Nir Levi’s perspective

I want to focus on Israeli SaaS companies, comparing how buyers ask about their products in Hebrew and English. That will help show clients their share of AI visibility against competitors and where the opportunities are.

Read the original research

The complete study, paired prompts, evidence downloads and Nir Levi’s commentary are available at https://nirlevi.com/en/research/israeli-geo-hebrew-english/

Put the finding to work

Nir Levi’s next GEO discussion with an Israeli business can therefore begin with evidence: the buyer question, the answer that appeared and the information needed to improve the company’s contribution to that research. The content plan follows from that review.

Explore GEO and AEO consulting in Israel with Nir Levi at nirlevi.com and bring a buyer question to your next review.